Skip to main content

Science & Libel

There's been quite a lot of talk in the media recently about the relationship between Science, Libel Law, Alternative Medicine and Evidence.  It's mostly in relation to the experiences of Simon Singh and others who have been sued in the UK for saying things like:
The British Chiropractic Association claims that their members can help treat children with colic, sleeping and feeding problems, frequent ear infections, asthma and prolonged crying, even though there is not a jot of evidence.
The Chiropractic Association in the UK took great offence at this for reasons I can't comprehend and decided to sue Dr Singh for rather a large sum of money.

Now, here's what I think about this. First there really is little or no evidence that chiropractic is any better than physiotherapy for treating back pain.  In fact, there appears to be real evidence that it's less effective (and in some rare cases, dangerous).  Further, many unscrupulous chiropractors claim that their treatments can be used for those with asthma, and for this there is zero evidence.  Simon Singh was only stating this as fact (which it is) and for him to be sued seems shameful.

Libel laws in the UK (and other countries) should not be used as a forum for settling scientific matters.  When this sort of claim is made is the media, the truth of the claim should be taken into account. If shown to be baseless accusation, then libel action may be appropriate.  But in cases where the claim made holds water, no libel case should be possible.

Anyway - chiropractic is basically ineffective.

I've had several experiences here in NZ where people have recommended to my partner that she should try it : "Oh, it worked for me" and "My friend had fabulous success with it" and yada yada like that.

Remember : personal experience is not evidence. Scientists call this anecdotal or testimonial evidence, and although it can be compelling, it has little value for showing the effectiveness of a medical treatment.

For example - if someone has a very sore back for some reason and saw a chiropractor, how would they know that it was the chiropractic treatment that made them feel better?  How could they know for sure that they wouldn't have got better anyway? Perhaps the 20 minute walk to the office was more helpful?  Or the physiotherapy they received? Or the type of milk they were drinking?  Or the weather? There are so many variables when looking at a single person, that individual experience is never used when testing medical treatment.

When testing treatments, scientists use Double Blind studies, where as much as possible, these sorts of unknown entities are statistically removed.  When we double blind test chiropractic, we find that it barely work at all, and certainly doesn't help with any non-back related issues.

I suggest you read the Wikipedia article on Chiropractic.  It shows the evidence for what it's actually good for (actually very little).  I also suggest you check out the Skepdic page on the subject.

While you're at it, add your support to the Libel Reform campaign.  It doesn't matter if you're not based in the UK.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Arráncame la vida

Last night we attended the first night of the Hola Mexico Film Festival in Wellington.  The first movie of the season was Arráncame la vida (Tear This Heart Out) , the story of a woman who marries a Mexican General in the years following the Mexican Revolution of 1910 .   I found it to be a real genre breaker as far as Mexican cinema goes.  Over the years, we've seen several Mexican movies, and the general theme seems to be heart breaking tragedy, and rarely a happy ending.  This one was different however.  Although tragedy played a huge part in the story (I don't want to give anything away, but don't get too attached to the Carlos character.  He doesn't last long..), the ending seems quite uplifting.  Well, comparatively at least. The story starts when the protagonist is 15 years old, and being whirlwinded into a marriage with a famous (or infamous) general, twice her age.  It tracks her sexual awakening as a teenager, through to her...

Auckland is off the menu (for now)

Jeese, but it was close. I was offered a very good perm role in Auckland and the agent was telling me that they needed a decision pretty damn quick!  Apparently they were going to meet with the company that very day, and wanted a yea or nay before COB the following day ("Close Of Business", just in case that's a stupid TLA - "Three Letter Acronym"). So, I was very pleased when I got word that a local company here in Wellington were interested in talking to me about a 6 month contract. The interview was arranged for the following morning. The interview went well: brief but covered most of the things you'd expect.  Nothing too technical but enough to weed out the stoopids. I think I did well enough, because they told me I was the "preferred candidate".  After some panic regarding getting by references sorted, the offer was made. I called the agent in Auckland, and she was very gracious. I started a few weeks back (hence the lack of updates ...

Gardening Rocks

Since we moved into our house here in the windy suburb of Newlands, we have been endeavouring to grow our own fresh produce. Early this summer, I planted Peas, Potatoes, Onions, Tomatoes and Silver beat. So far, the peas and potatoes have been the most successful, but I hold good hopes for the onions and tomatoes later in the summer. The silver beat, well, I don't really like it anyway... Peas... ...and spuds For dinner yesterday we bought some decent quality filet steak and some prawns.  If that doesn't scream Surf N Turf, I don't know what does! We picked some peas and dug up some potatoes. Oh boy: excellent! There's nothing quite like having diner that is mostly made up your own garden produce.